Philosophical Worldviews
Before I take my first graduate Political Science course, I thought that I would brush up on their research methods. I have taken a graduate Historical Research Methods course, but I know that the Social Scientists do things a bit differently. For example, most historians don't really worry about quantitative research (too busy finding scarce primary source documents, so you certainly can't find accurate numbers). However, American Military University in their wisdom gave me transfer credit for my Historical Research Methods class so I don't have to take the Research Methods in Social Sciences class. This is good, but I was sort of looking forward to learning about the research methodology.
So I ordered the textbook for the Research Methods class and am reading through it before my Public Policy class begins (Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, by John Creswell). In this textbook Creswell mentions four Philosophical Worldviews the different researchers may or may not have. He says that it is important to figure out your worldview before you start designing your research project so that you can use the best research methods that will complement your philosophical outlook.
I found out that I have two different outlooks depending upon what type of paper I am writing. As a Historian I have what Creswell calls the Social Constructive worldview. I look at the society and individuals in the time period without preconceptions and try to figure out what was going on way back when, understanding that different societies have different worldviews themselves. When I am working on a Political Science paper I realize that I am what Creswell calls a Pragmatist; more concerned with finding out what works in a messy world, than worried about creating a theory that fits all the facts. I then find out that Rorty (a philosopher favored by Andrew) has written about Pragmatism, and I should use this occasion to learn more about Rorty and Pragmatism.
Perhaps Andrew has a reading list for me.
So I ordered the textbook for the Research Methods class and am reading through it before my Public Policy class begins (Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, by John Creswell). In this textbook Creswell mentions four Philosophical Worldviews the different researchers may or may not have. He says that it is important to figure out your worldview before you start designing your research project so that you can use the best research methods that will complement your philosophical outlook.
I found out that I have two different outlooks depending upon what type of paper I am writing. As a Historian I have what Creswell calls the Social Constructive worldview. I look at the society and individuals in the time period without preconceptions and try to figure out what was going on way back when, understanding that different societies have different worldviews themselves. When I am working on a Political Science paper I realize that I am what Creswell calls a Pragmatist; more concerned with finding out what works in a messy world, than worried about creating a theory that fits all the facts. I then find out that Rorty (a philosopher favored by Andrew) has written about Pragmatism, and I should use this occasion to learn more about Rorty and Pragmatism.
Perhaps Andrew has a reading list for me.
posted by Jon Benignus @ 6:10 PM
3 comments
